<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
 <title>perpetuallypissed.com aggregator</title>
 <link>http://www.perpetuallypissed.com//aggregator/categories/2</link>
 <description>perpetuallypissed.com - aggregated feeds in category Net Politics</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>EFF: Hey ITU Member States: No More Secrecy, Release the Treaty Proposals</title>
 <link>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/hey-itu-member-states-no-more-secrecy-release-wcit-documents-0</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot; property=&quot;content:encoded&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span&gt;The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) will hold the World Conference on International Telecommunications (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internetsociety.org/wcit&quot;&gt;WCIT-12&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;) in December in Dubai, an all-important treaty-writing event where ITU Member States will discuss the proposed revisions to the International Telecommunication Regulations (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internetsociety.org/itr&quot;&gt;ITR&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;). The &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itu.int/en/about/Pages/default.aspx&quot;&gt;ITU&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; is a United Nations agency responsible for international telecom regulation, a bureaucratic, slow-moving, closed regulatory organization that issues treaty-level provisions for international telecommunication networks and services. The ITR, a legally binding international treaty signed by 178 countries, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.itu.int/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=c5zkrxxpiNw%3D&amp;amp;tabid=1862&quot;&gt;defines&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; the boundaries of ITU’s regulatory authority and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.itu.int/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=c5zkrxxpiNw%3D&amp;amp;tabid=1862&quot;&gt;provides&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; &quot;general principles&quot; on international telecommunications.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; However, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/edward-j-black/uns-itu-could-become-next_b_1332768.html&quot;&gt;media reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; indicate that some proposed amendments to the ITR—a negotiation that is already well underway—could potentially expand the ITU’s mandate to encompass the Internet. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/hey-itu-member-states-no-more-secrecy-release-wcit-documents-0&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 20:14:51 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EFF: Swedish Telcom Giant Teliasonera Caught Helping Authoritarian Regimes Spy on Their Citizens</title>
 <link>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/swedish-telcom-giant-teliasonera-caught-helping-authoritarian-regimes-spy-its</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot; property=&quot;content:encoded&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to a recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://vimeo.com/41248885&quot;&gt;investigation&lt;/a&gt; by the Swedish news show &lt;em&gt;Uppdrag Granskning&lt;/em&gt;, Sweden’s telecommunications giant Teliasonera is the latest Western company revealed to be colluding with authoritarian regimes by selling them high-tech surveillance gear to spy on its citizens. Teliasonera has allegedly enabled the governments of Belarus, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Georgia and Kazakhstan to spy on journalists, union leaders, and members of the political opposition. One Teliasonera whistle-blower told the reporters, “The Arab Spring prompted the regimes to tighten their surveillance. ... There’s no limit to how much wiretapping is done, none at all.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/swedish-telcom-giant-teliasonera-caught-helping-authoritarian-regimes-spy-its&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:41:03 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EFF: Local Governments Have the Power to Restrict Drone Surveillance in the US</title>
 <link>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/local-governments-have-power-restrict-drone-surveillance-us</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot; property=&quot;content:encoded&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;A series of events in the last two weeks have set the stage for how surveillance drones will be operated by local law enforcement in the United States and how citizens can demand privacy protections as domestic use escalates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As EFF has previously reported, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2012/2/8/2784929/congress-faa-drone-bill-passes-domestic-airspace-licensing&quot;&gt;Congress passed a bill&lt;/a&gt; in February mandating the FAA must open national airspace to drones, despite the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty-national-security/drones-nightmare-scenario&quot;&gt;extensive and unprecedented civil liberties dangers&lt;/a&gt; they pose to every American. The FAA, in new rules &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=68004&quot;&gt;announced on Monday&lt;/a&gt;, made the authorization procedure easier, stating they have “streamlined the process” for “public agencies”—which includes local law enforcement—to legally operate drones in U.S. skies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/local-governments-have-power-restrict-drone-surveillance-us&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:08:17 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EFF: EFF Joins Coalition Denouncing Secretive WCIT Planning Process</title>
 <link>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/eff-joins-coalition-denouncing-secretive-wcit-planning-process</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot; property=&quot;content:encoded&quot;&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Civil Society Seeks Access to Planning Documents for Secret Negotiations Around Internet Regulation&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An upcoming treaty renegotiation process could prove to have dire implications for digital civil rights. As we have &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/hey-itu-member-states-no-more-secrecy-release-wcit-documents-0&quot;&gt;explained&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://internetsociety.org/wcit&quot;&gt;World Conference on International Telecommunications&lt;/a&gt; – &quot;WCIT&quot; for short, pronounced “wicket” by insiders – will be held in Dubai this coming December, and preparations for this important treaty-writing conference are in full swing. The forum is being organized by a secretive United Nations agency called the International Telecommunication Union (ITU).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/eff-joins-coalition-denouncing-secretive-wcit-planning-process&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:29:49 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EFF: Don’t let this sticky wicket overshadow Internet freedom</title>
 <link>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/don%E2%80%99t-let-sticky-wicket-overshadow-internet-freedom</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot; property=&quot;content:encoded&quot;&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;An upcoming treaty renegotiation process could prove to be the next great threat to online freedom in the international realm. As we have &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/hey-itu-member-states-no-more-secrecy-release-wcit-documents-0&quot;&gt;explained&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://internetsociety.org/wcit&quot;&gt;World Conference on International Telecommunications&lt;/a&gt; – “WCIT” for short, pronounced “wicket” by insiders – will be held in Dubai this coming December, and preparations for this important treaty-writing conference are in full swing. The forum is being organized by a bureaucratic United Nations agency called the International Telecommunication Union (ITU).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/don%E2%80%99t-let-sticky-wicket-overshadow-internet-freedom&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:29:49 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EFF: With New Privacy Policy, Twitter Commits to Respecting Do Not Track</title>
 <link>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/new-privacy-policy-twitter-commits-respecting-do-not-track</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot; property=&quot;content:encoded&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Under a new policy &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.twitter.com/2012/05/new-tailored-suggestions-for-you-to.html&quot;&gt;announced today&lt;/a&gt;, Twitter will be &lt;a href=&quot;https://support.twitter.com/articles/20169421&quot;&gt;suggesting accounts&lt;/a&gt; for Twitter users to follow based on data collected from an individual’s browsing habits on websites that have embedded Twitter buttons. While this is sure to garner scrutiny from the press and public, Twitter is also taking a pioneering step toward respecting users’ privacy choices: it has committed to respecting &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/issues/do-not-track&quot;&gt;Do Not Track&lt;/a&gt; -- a simple browser setting users can turn on to tell website they don’t want to be tracked. Often framed as a signal from users to behavioral advertisers, Do Not Track isn’t actually about ads we see online; it’s about user control over tracking of our web usage that could be used to build an intimate portrait of our online lives. Twitter is showing an inventive way that websites other than behavioral advertisers can respect Do Not Track. We’re heartened to see this forward-thinking approach and hope other sites with embedded widgets will follow suit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/new-privacy-policy-twitter-commits-respecting-do-not-track&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:56:33 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EFF: U.S. Law Professors Cast Further Doubt on ACTA&#039;s Constitutionality - State Department Confirms No ACTA Pre-Review</title>
 <link>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/acta-unconstitutional-without-congressional-approval</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot; property=&quot;content:encoded&quot;&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Fifty leading U.S. legal scholars cast fresh doubt on the constitutionality of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement in an open &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infojustice.org/senatefinance-may2012&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;letter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; to the Senate Finance Committee today. (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infojustice.org/law-professors-declare-anti-counterfeiting-trade-agreement-unconstitutional-without-congressional-approval&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Press Release&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;). &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;At issue is whether the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) had authority to enter into the controversial IP enforcement agreement on behalf of the United States when the Deputy U.S. Trade Ambassador signed ACTA in October 2011. The law professors say no, and call on the Senators to “exercise &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;your constitutional responsibility to ensure that the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) is submitted to the Senate for approval as an Article II treaty, or to the Congress as an ex-post Congressional-Executive Agreement.” &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/acta-unconstitutional-without-congressional-approval&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:07:45 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Creative Commons: Culture Freedom Day is May 19</title>
 <link>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32697</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.culturefreedomday.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.culturefreedomday.org/images/banners/cfd-wide.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Get ready to join Culture Freedom Day&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This Saturday is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.culturefreedomday.org/&quot;&gt;Culture Freedom Day&lt;/a&gt;, a worldwide celebration of free and open culture through education efforts, on- and offline events, and promoting artists who work in free culture. Culture Freedom Day is organized by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalfreedominternational.org/&quot;&gt;Digital Freedom International&lt;/a&gt;, a nonprofit that also promotes &lt;a href=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/tag/software-freedom-day&quot;&gt;software freedom&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32697&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:05:09 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Creative Commons: COMMUNIA explores role of digital public domain in final report</title>
 <link>http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32667</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/url.jpeg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;Communia logo&quot; width=&quot;450&quot; height=&quot;103&quot; class=&quot;aligncenter size-full wp-image-31493&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From 2007 to 2011, COMMUNIA was a project funded by the European Commission to explore the role of the public domain in the digital age. Over four years, &lt;a href=&quot;http://communia-project.eu&quot;&gt;COMMUNIA&lt;/a&gt;, or The European Thematic Network on the Digital Public Domain, gathered over 50 members from academia and the CC community to research, promote, and preserve the digital public domain. In 2011, COMMUNIA&amp;#8217;s members decided to continue the network as an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.communia-association.org/&quot;&gt;international nonprofit association&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32667&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:12:31 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EFF: This Week in Internet Censorship: India, Iran, Brazil, Russia, and More</title>
 <link>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/week-internet-censorship-iran-censors-internet-censorship-decree-indian-government</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot; property=&quot;content:encoded&quot;&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Iran Continues March Towards “Halal Internet” &lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This past weekend, Iran’s minister of telecommunications announced that domestic institutions including banks, telecom companies, insurance firms, and universities are now prohibited from dealing with emails that do not come from an “.ir” domain name. This means that customers who use foreign email clients such as Gmail, Yahoo!, and Hotmail will have to switch to domestic Iranian accounts, which are subject to Iranian legal jurisdiction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/05/week-internet-censorship-iran-censors-internet-censorship-decree-indian-government&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:27:42 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

